Chargers' Undrafted Haul Reveals Gearick's Measured Approach to Building Depth Beyond Draft Capital
The Los Angeles Chargers have quietly assembled what amounts to a secondary draft class by inking 18 undrafted free agents to their post-draft roster, a move that deserves closer examination than the typical "here are the names and schools" treatment these signings usually receive. This isn't just about filling out a practice squad or finding lottery tickets in the seventh round equivalent. This is about how the Chargers organization, under relatively new leadership, is thinking about talent acquisition, roster construction, and the economics of building a sustainable roster in a salary-capped league where every dollar matters.
Let's start with the obvious observation that 18 undrafted signings is a significant number. Most NFL teams sign somewhere between 10 and 20 undrafted free agents, so the Chargers are operating within normal parameters here. But the specific makeup of this class and the strategic intent behind these signings tells us something important about how general manager Joe Hortiz and his scouting staff are viewing their current roster composition and future needs. The NFL draft in 2024 was the Chargers' first opportunity to build under the new regime, and while they addressed several positions through the seven-round process, undrafted free agents represent a continuation of that philosophy rather than a separate track.
One of the more interesting elements of this signing class is the reunion angle. The presence of an undrafted prospect who previously worked with defensive coordinator Chris O'Leary suggests the coaching staff has direct input into personnel decisions, which is increasingly common across the league but worth noting because it impacts how we should evaluate these signings. When a defensive coordinator brings in a specific player he has experience coaching, it typically means one of two things: either the player performed well for him previously and there's legitimate conviction that he can contribute at the NFL level, or this is a calculated risk on someone with upside who might not show up on tape for scouts who didn't see him play for O'Leary's defensive scheme.
The CBA implications here are also worth considering, though they don't generate the same headlines as seven-figure free agent signings. Undrafted free agents sign for the rookie minimum under current CBA rules, which means the Chargers are getting access to 18 potential contributors for approximately $750,000 in guaranteed money per player in 2024, before any per diem or housing allowances. Compare that to what it would cost to acquire similar depth through waiver claims or mid-level free agent contracts, and you understand why every team prioritizes this period. The Chargers are essentially getting 18 shots on goal without the salary cap implications of veteran deals.
However, the economics get more complicated when you factor in practice squad considerations and potential future guarantees. If any of these 18 players make the practice squad and stick around through multiple seasons, the Chargers could be building future salary cap obligations. But for 2024, this is pure value extraction. The team is using its scouting infrastructure to identify players who weren't deemed worthy of draft picks but might have NFL potential, then testing that theory with minimal financial risk.
The timing of these announcements is also instructive. The Chargers are announcing these signings after the draft concluded and after other teams have already made their undrafted free agent moves. This suggests some selectivity in approach. Rather than announcing a massive signing class immediately post-draft like some franchises do, the Chargers appear to have been strategic about which undrafted players they pursued and when they pursued them. This could indicate they were targeting specific players who might have otherwise been under consideration by other teams, or it could simply reflect the organic nature of how these signings happen as draft grades stabilize and teams identify the players they actually want to develop.
The positional breakdown of these 18 signings would tell us quite a bit about where the Chargers see roster vulnerabilities or where they want to build depth for developmental purposes. Without getting into specifics about each player (because many of these prospects are genuinely unknown at this point), the general principle is that undrafted free agents in the modern NFL serve two primary functions: they fill holes where the draft class was weak or expensive, and they provide developmental depth that might eventually contribute. The Chargers' draft class this year appeared to focus on offensive line upgrades and defensive improvements, so it would make sense that undrafted signings would come in secondary positions like defensive back, wide receiver, linebacker, or tight end where depth is always valuable.
From a philosophical standpoint, the Chargers under Hortiz appear to be building a more analytical approach to roster construction. The combination of specific draft picks and then a carefully curated undrafted free agent class suggests a team that's thinking about positional value, draft efficiency, and where you can find production outside the formal draft process. This is increasingly how successful organizations operate. The draft is important, yes, but the ability to identify talent that slipped through the cracks or didn't perform at elite programs is equally valuable.
The O'Leary connection also raises interesting questions about coaching staff autonomy. If a defensive coordinator can bring in specific players he's previously coached, does that create alignment between coaching and personnel? Or does it potentially create silos where coaches are making personnel decisions that conflict with the front office's overall strategy? This isn't necessarily problematic if Hortiz and his staff are aligned on philosophy, but it's a dynamic worth monitoring going forward. The best organizations have coaches and scouts pulling in the same direction, and undrafted free agent signings that come from coaching connections are a way to measure whether that's actually happening.
The practice squad implications deserve mention as well. These 18 players will compete for spots on the 16-man practice squad, which means some will inevitably be cut or moved to injured reserve during the preseason. The Chargers are essentially running a secondary evaluation period during August, using camp as a final filter to determine which of these prospects have any legitimate chance to contribute. In an era where practice squad depth matters more than ever (since you can elevate practice squad players to the active roster for games), building a strong practice squad through undrafted free agents and then developing them over seasons has become a core competency for franchises.
What this signing class ultimately tells us is that the Chargers are approaching roster building with intentionality and patience. They're not panic-signing every undrafted prospect who declares for the draft. They're being selective about which players fit their system, and they're willing to take calculated risks on prospects who have upside but didn't hear their names called in April. This is how sustained competitive teams operate. The 2024 draft won't be won or lost by any single player, but it will be evaluated in three to four years when we can actually measure whether some of these 18 undrafted signings contributed to winning football.
