News Full Schedule Strength of Schedule Season Predictor Free Agency Power Rankings Mock Draft Hub Draft Tracker
Breaking
← NFLRumors.us
NFL News

Stop Falling for the Preseason Rookie QB Mirage. Drew Allar's Three TDs Mean Absolutely Nothing.

Here is what I need to tell you right now, because the NFL media landscape is already getting this wrong. Three touchdown passes in one preseason game does not make a rookie quarterback an NFL-ready prospect. I don't care if it was Drew Allar, Fernando Mendoza, Ty Simpson, or Tom Brady's ghost out there slinging it around. The preseason is a laboratory for schemes, depth chart battles, and injury prevention. It is not a measuring stick for quarterback evaluation. Yet every single year, we watch the same play out. A rookie has a nice preseason outing against backups and undrafted free agents, and suddenly the narrative machine kicks into high gear. This is how bad evaluations start.

Let me be clear about something first. Drew Allar can throw a football. The kid has arm talent. I see that. But arm talent is not the question with rookie quarterbacks in the NFL. The question is whether he can process information at the speed of real football. Can he go through progressions under pressure from actual NFL defensive ends? Can he recognize coverage looks that are designed specifically to confuse him? Can he understand when he needs to get rid of the ball versus when he can wait for his guy? These are things that three preseason drives against third and fourth string defenders tell us absolutely nothing about. Nothing.

The problem with preseason quarterback evaluation is that the environment is completely divorced from what actually matters in September and beyond. The defensive coordinators on the opposing sideline are not bringing their A-game schemes. They are running vanilla coverages to see what their corners can do in live action. They are not sending exotic blitzes designed to attack a young quarterback's weaknesses. The offensive line opposite the rookie is filled with guys fighting for roster spots, not players trying to make fifteen million a year. The coverage shells are basic. The safety help is predictable. This is not football. This is glorified practice, and we treat it like it is the Super Bowl.

I watched the tape of Allar's preseason performance, and here is what I saw. He threw some balls that looked nice. His footwork was clean on a couple throws. But I also saw him holding the ball longer than he needs to against a defense that is not trying to hurt him. I saw him miss some throws into tight windows that NFL starting cornerbacks would have intercepted. I saw him make one or two decisions that looked good only because the safety was playing twenty yards deep instead of eight. This is not indictment of Allar necessarily. This is just reality. Preseason games are not meaningful. They never have been, and they never will be.

Here is the thing that really gets me though. The NFL media has decided that certain narratives are going to stick regardless of what the actual evidence suggests. Allar had a good preseason game, so now he is a prospect on the rise. Mendoza looked solid, so he is a sleeper. Simpson made some throws, so maybe the Titans are onto something. None of these conclusions are remotely supported by what we actually know about these players. We know they can throw against backups. That is it. That is the entire sum total of useful information we gained from week one of the preseason.

The historical record on this is abundantly clear. I can rattle off a dozen examples of rookie quarterbacks who had stellar preseason showings and then could not get on the field in the regular season because they completely fell apart when the lights came on. I can also name guys who were terrible in preseason and ended up being quality starters. The preseason tells you nothing because the game itself is nothing. It is window dressing. It is a television event designed to give fans something to watch and let teams run conditioning drills. Treating it like it is meaningful evaluation is how franchises make bad decisions.

What really matters with rookie quarterbacks is how they perform in real games against real defenses. That means the regular season. That means going up against defensive coordinators who are scheming specifically to take advantage of your inexperience. That means having to move in the pocket against actual pass rushers trying to kill you. That means making reads when your primary option is blanketed and you have to find the second progression. That means handling pressure, staying calm in the pocket, and making decisions under duress. None of these things happen in preseason. The defenses are not good enough. The schemes are not complex enough. The stakes are not high enough.

I understand why the media falls into this trap. The preseason is the only football we have early in August. Teams are begging for coverage. Rookie quarterback races are inherently interesting because there is genuine uncertainty. So the natural tendency is to treat preseason performances as meaningful data points. But that is backwards thinking. That is letting the calendar drive your analysis instead of letting football reality drive it. Preseason games should tell you exactly one thing about a quarterback: does he have mobility issues, or is he dealing with an injury? That is it. Everything else is noise.

Fernando Mendoza throwing touchdown passes to receivers who are going to be cut before the season starts is not meaningful data. Ty Simpson looking competent against a defense that is essentially a pickup game is not meaningful data. Drew Allar orchestrating three scoring drives when nobody is trying particularly hard to stop him is not meaningful data. None of these things tell us anything about how these guys will perform when they are standing in the pocket at Arrowhead Stadium with a blitzing linebacker coming straight at their face. None of it.

The real evaluation of these rookie quarterbacks will happen starting in September. That is when we will know what we actually have. That is when we will see if they can handle the real speed of the game. That is when we will see if their decision making holds up under pressure. That is when we will see if they can go through progressions in real time against real schemes. That is when coverage looks are more complex. That is when the pass rush is actually trying to get home. That is when quarterbacks either show they belong in the NFL or they show they do not.

So here is my verdict on all of this rookie quarterback preseason hype. Stop it. Just stop. Stop pretending that preseason games matter. Stop using them as a basis for big proclamations about a player's future. Stop letting the media narrative drag you into believing that three touchdown passes in August tell you anything meaningful about a quarterback's NFL future. They do not. They never have. The only thing the preseason tells you is which guys show no catastrophic injuries and which guys look completely lost. Everything else is speculation dressed up as analysis.

The NFL gets this wrong every single year. It sees a kid have a nice preseason and suddenly projects him into the future based on incomplete information. Teams have made draft decisions based on preseason performance. Analysts have made career predictions based on preseason performance. It is all foolish. It is all a waste of time and mental energy. Judge these rookie quarterbacks on real football. Judge them in September. Judge them against NFL-caliber talent trying to stop them. That is when you will know who they actually are.

VERDICT: Preseason rookie quarterback evaluation is borderline worthless. Don't believe the hype. Wait until real games count.